Leading Answers

Leadership and agility insights
Mike@LeadingAnswers.com

4.1 Develop Project Charter

 

Back to Process Group Mappings

4.1 Develop Project Charter

The process of developing a document that formally authorizes a project or phase and documenting initial requirements that satisfy the stakeholders’ needs and expectations.  It establishes partnership between performing group and requesting group and formally initiates the project.

 

Simple Version: Create the document that defines the project W5+ characteristics:

    What the project is for – scope outline

    Why the project is being undertaken – business benefits

    Who will be undertaking the project and who will be impacted – indentify stakeholders

    When the project will occur – schedule outline

    Where will the project be done – logistics outline, resources required

  How the project will be undertake – approach outline

 

PMI

 

Agile

PMBOK, Agile Difference, Comment

Inputs

Project Statement of Work

Business Case

Contract

Enterprise Environmental Factors (Govt standards, organizational infrastructure, marketplace conditions)

Organizational Process Assets (standards, templates, Lessons Learned notes)

 

Tools and Techniques

Expert Judgement

 

Outputs

Project Charter

 

Inputs

Project Statement of Work – This may be light on detail for agile

Business Case

Contract (See dsdm.org for an agile contract)

Enterprise Environmental Factors (Govt standards, organizational infrastructure, marketplace conditions)

Organizational Process Assets (standards, templates, Lessons Learned notes)

 

Tools and Techniques

Expert Judgement

 

Outputs

Project Charter / Project Vision

 

Agile projects still need to be kicked off in a way similar to a traditional project, but the model of engagement and management of expectations may need to be different.

A Project Charter should outline the W5+ (Why, What, Who, When, Where, and How) aspects of a project. For some organizations the “What will be done” and “How it will be done” may be different to in an agile environment than how they have done things before. So spent time to explain different approaches, such as iterative development, increased business involvement, empowered teams, retrospectives, etc.

 


Related Posts

AI Agent Impacts on Project Management

Leading a Team That’s Part Machine: 5) AI Agent Impacts on Project Management

This is the 5th and last installment in my series about Leading a Team that’s Part Machine. The earlier articles are available here: Introduction to the series and why the future will likely include hybrid human / AI teams What constitutes a real agent and how most current ‘agents’ lack the agency to act Agent frameworks, API tokens and local AI: the infrastructure that runs agents Agentic pipelines and orchestration: getting agents to do meaningful work beyond what GenAI tools can do for us today This article explores how to integrate AI Agents into regular teamwork and their likely impacts on the future of project management.  To recap, I started my experiment by building AI agents 6 months ago to

Read More
20 years of Leading Answers

20 Years of Leading Answers

Twenty years ago today, on August 29, 2006, I published the first posts on LeadingAnswers.com. That sentence makes me feel old. I started the blog to write about leadership and agile project management, share ideas I was experimenting with, and hopefully connect with other people interested in the same things. At the time, agile was still sufficiently new that explaining it to traditional project managers was a large part of the job. My first real article was called “What has Leadership got to do with Agile Project Management?” My argument was that effective agile project management was much closer to leadership than traditional project management. It emphasized people over tasks, empowerment over control, effectiveness over efficiency, and direction over speed.

Read More